Patent Act Article 43

Patent Act Article 43May 1, 2019
Amendment during examination; final notice Unless otherwise stipulated in this Act, when examining a patent application for invention, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon request or on its own initiative, notify the applicant to amend the description, claim(s), or drawings within a specified time period. Except for correction of translation errors, any amendment shall not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) as filed. Where the Specific Patent Agency has issued a notice pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 46, a patent applicant shall only make amendment(s) within the specified time period in the notice. The Specific Patent Agency may, as it deems necessary, issue a final notice after having issued a notice prescribed in the preceding paragraph. The applicant who is to amend claim(s) after a final notice has been issued shall only make the following amendments within the time period specified therein: 1. to delete claim(s); 2. to narrow down the scope of claim(s); 3. to correct errors; or 4. to clarify ambiguous statement(s). In case of a violation of the provisions in the preceding two paragraphs, the Specific Patent Agency shall state the reasons in a written decision and render such decision accordingly. The Specific Patent Agency may issue a final notice accordingly if the original patent application or its divisional application meets any of the following conditions: 1. where the content of the notice issued for the original patent application is same as that of the notice issued for the divisional patent application; 2. where the content of the notice issued for the divisional patent application is same as that of the notice issued for the original patent application; or 3. where the content of the notice issued for a divisional application is same as that of the notice issued for other divisional application(s).

Patent Act Article 43May 1, 2019

Amendment during examination; final notice

Unless otherwise stipulated in this Act, when examining a patent application for invention, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon request or on its own initiative, notify the applicant to amend the description, claim(s), or drawings within a specified time period.

Except for correction of translation errors, any amendment shall not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) as filed.

Where the Specific Patent Agency has issued a notice pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 46, a patent applicant shall only make amendment(s) within the specified time period in the notice.

The Specific Patent Agency may, as it deems necessary, issue a final notice after having issued a notice prescribed in the preceding paragraph. The applicant who is to amend claim(s) after a final notice has been issued shall only make the following amendments within the time period specified therein:

1. to delete claim(s);
2. to narrow down the scope of claim(s);
3. to correct errors; or
4. to clarify ambiguous statement(s).

In case of a violation of the provisions in the preceding two paragraphs, the Specific Patent Agency shall state the reasons in a written decision and render such decision accordingly.

The Specific Patent Agency may issue a final notice accordingly if the original patent application or its divisional application meets any of the following conditions:
1. where the content of the notice issued for the original patent application is same as that of the notice issued for the divisional patent application;
2. where the content of the notice issued for the divisional patent application is same as that of the notice issued for the original patent application; or
3. where the content of the notice issued for a divisional application is same as that of the notice issued for other divisional application(s).

Same Article Laws

Other Related Laws

Patent Act Article 46May 1, 2019
Grounds for rejection of invention patent application "When a patent application for invention is in violation of the provisions set forth in Articles 21 through 24, Article 26, Article 31, Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 32, Article 33, Paragraph 4 and the forepart of Paragraph 6 of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of Article 43, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 44, or Paragraph 3 of Article 108, a decision of rejection shall be rendered. "Before rendering a decision in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify the applicant to file a response within a specified time period. If the applicant fails to make a response within the time period, a decision of rejection shall be rendered accordingly. Details >

Patent Act Article 46May 1, 2019

Grounds for rejection of invention patent application "When a patent application for invention is in violation of the provisions set forth in Articles 21 through 24, Article 26, Article 31, Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 32, Article 33, Paragraph 4 and the forepart of Paragraph 6 of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of Article 43, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 44, or Paragraph 3 of Article 108, a decision of rejection shall be rendered. "Before rendering a decision in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify the applicant to file a response within a specified time period. If the applicant fails to make a response within the time period, a decision of rejection shall be rendered accordingly.

Details >

Type	National Taxes	Municipal, County or City Taxes
Direct Taxes	Individual Income Tax Profit-Seeking Enterprise Income Tax Securities Transaction Tax Futures Transaction Tax Estate Tax Gift Tax	Deed Tax Land Value Tax Land Value Increment Tax House Tax Agricultural Land Tax
Indirect Taxes	Value-Added and Non-Value Added Business Tax Tobacco and Alcohol Tax Commodity Tax Custom Duties Specifically Selected Goods and Services Tax	Stamp Tax Vehicle License Tax Amusement Tax Special and Provisional Tax

Same Article Laws

Other Related Laws

Taiwan Law Search

Find relevant Taiwanese Law by searching for keywords in English.